Full disclosure: This review is written by ClauseBase, a vendor of legal drafting & reviewing software. It is part of a series of reviews in which we unveil how certain (competing) software packages work from a technical perspective, particularly those that themselves remain fairly silent on this subject. It is our intention to be honest in unveiling how everything works, stating both what's good and bad about the technical choices that were made by the vendor. However, as the respective vendors remain silent on technical details, the reviews are based on a combination of discussions with users, lawyers who attented demos, limited interactions we had ourselves, as well as knowledge we have ourselves about the various tradeoffs associated with the technologies being used. If you're the vendor of the product that's being reviewed, and you would spot mistakes, please let us know.
How do you centralize legal drafting knowledge for 170+ in-house lawyers? �
How do you leverage that knowledge to empower business units and ease the workload of busy lawyers?
In the case of AES Corporation, it was a matter of creating a standardized repository of clauses and templates, aided by the ClauseBase suite of legal drafting tools.
In the words of Raquel Rodriguez, Associate General Counsel: “… the decision to adopt ClauseBase was an obvious one.”
Read the full case study here!
