A look at how smaller legal teams are leveraging ClauseBase to assist their business colleagues
Full disclosure: This review is written by ClauseBase, a vendor of legal drafting & reviewing software. It is part of a series of reviews in which we unveil how certain (competing) software packages work from a technical perspective, particularly those that themselves remain fairly silent on this subject. It is our intention to be honest in unveiling how everything works, stating both what's good and bad about the technical choices that were made by the vendor. However, as the respective vendors remain silent on technical details, the reviews are based on a combination of discussions with users, lawyers who attented demos, limited interactions we had ourselves, as well as knowledge we have ourselves about the various tradeoffs associated with the technologies being used. If you're the vendor of the product that's being reviewed, and you would spot mistakes, please let us know.
FLYERALARM’s legal team, like many smaller legal teams, sits at the centre of a web of business inquiries that come from every part of the company.
Sebastian Ehrhardt, Head of Legal at FLYERALARM, realised that standardisation, process improvement, and centralised knowledge sharing were going to be crucial if the team was to keep up with the company’s impressive growth.
Read on to learn how the legal team at FLYERALARM achieved just that by adopting the ClauseBase suite of drafting tools!
